Matteo Gigante vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Aug at 06:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Gigante vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

ITA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

HKG
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 1 Wong
They have played 6 sets in total, with Matteo Gigante winning 3 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 3. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Matteo Gigante was at the U.S. Open - New York, 21-08-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gigante | 1 |
| Wong | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q2) U.S. Open - New York(08-21-25)
(Q3) Nottingham 2 Challenger(06-15-25)
M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $571,445 | Career Prize Money | $538,970 |
| 57.68% (169-124) | Career Total W/L | 55.78% (164-130) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 50.00% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (5-6) |
M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance indicates Wong has a slightly higher win rate on points at 47.81% compared to Gigante's 45.12%. Could this serve reliability tip the scales?
- On return games, Gigante holds a significant edge by winning 49.21% of the opponent's second serve points, surpassing Wong's 41.83%. Will this give Gigante the upper hand in gameplay?
- When returning the first serve, Gigante outperforms Wong with a 26.56% win rate compared to 22.99%. Is Gigante's ability to counter strong serves decisive here?
- Under pressure, Gigante saves breakpoints 54.85% of the time, slightly outperforming Wong’s 51.53%. Could this resilience be crucial in tight situations?
- General performance over the past year reveals Gigante has a win rate of 56.45%, somewhat higher than Wong's 52.7%. Does this suggest better consistency?
- Both athletes favor hard courts, though Gigante has a higher career win rate at 69% than Wong's 59%. Is this experience on their preferred surface a pivotal factor?
- Their competition primarily in Challenger/ITF tournaments shows Wong winning a slightly higher percentage of matches at 55.32% versus Gigante's 53.85%. How significant is this difference?
- Gigante leads the direct head-to-head battles, having won their previous encounter and possessing a 1-0 record over Wong.
- In high-stakes games, including decisive sets and tiebreaks, Gigante has consistently come out on top against Wong. Could this psychological advantage sway the match?
- Competition against higher-ranked opponents favor Gigante who faced an average rank of 205.55, compared to Wong’s 223.99. Does competing against tough opponents bolster Gigante's readiness?
- Gigante exhibits superior strength in deciding sets, winning 76% over the last year, whereas Wong has a win rate of 55%. Could this be critical if the match extends?
- In terms of recent breakpoint conversion, Wong surpasses Gigante with a 36.61% success rate against 31.76%. Will Wong's proficiency in capitalizing on breakpoints make a difference?
Editorial Prediction (August 21, 2025, UTC):
Gigante and Wong face each other on familiar hard court terrain, but various factors suggest Gigante might have a competitive edge. With a superior return game, especially against both first and second serves, Gigante seems well-positioned to exploit this facet of Wong's play effectively.
Gigante also showcases a commendable ability to endure under pressure, evident from breakpoint saving statistics and previous head-to-head encounters. The mental fortitude and experience in high-stakes scenarios are further supported by an impressive track record in deciding sets.
While Wong's recent performance, particularly in second serve and breakpoints, is notable, Gigante's consistency and past direct victories over Wong signal a potential repeat triumph. Taking into account Gigante's higher win percentage on preferred surfaces and experience against tougher opponents, Gigante emerges as the likely victor in this impending match.
Matteo Gigante vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 30 | Games Won | 30 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:6:21 | Average Match Time | 2:6:21 |
| 57% (104/184) | 1st Serve % | 57% (121/211) |
| 72% (75/104) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (91/121) |
| 50% (40/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (36/90) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Pts Won % | 37% (7/19) |
| 40% (84/211) | Return Points Win % | 38% (69/184) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Gigante Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 4-2 ret. | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
F | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||

M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.68% (169/124) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.78% (164/130) |
| 55.33% (384/310) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.07% (372/316) |
| 51.96% (3409/3152) | Games Win/Loss | 51.16% (3419/3264) |
| 67.44% (58/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.90% (129/90) |
| 59.26% (96/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.51% (20/23) |
| 27.78% (10/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 934 | Aces Total | 1687 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1012 | Total Double Faults | 603 |
| 1:35:50 | Average Match Time | 1:31:40 |
| 359.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 369.61 |
| 59% (11812/19965) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11331/18739) |
| 68% (8068/11812) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8054/11331) |
| 49% (4031/8153) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3631/7408) |
| 43% (920/2128) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (703/1718) |
| 41% (8280/20212) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7230/18830) |
| 57.69% (15/11) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Masters W/L | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 57.07% (109/82) | Challenger W/L | 55.65% (69/55) |
| 72.55% (37/14) | Futures W/L | 59.50% (72/49) |
| 58% (164/281) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (157/286) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 56% (51/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (56/102) |
| 57% (59/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 79% (173/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 20% (173/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/21) |
| 25% (120/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (137/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

James Duckworth vs Filip Peliwo Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Matteo Berrettini vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Jaume Antoni Munar Clar Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets
