Matteo Gigante vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 21 Aug at 06:49 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Gigante vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Matteo Gigante
Matteo Gigante

Flag ITA ITA

l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Flag HKG HKG

l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l

1

Win

2

Played

1

Win

23
Age
21
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
151
C. Rank
149
125
Best Rank
128
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$571.4K
Career Money
$539.0K
Left-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 1 Wong

They have played 6 sets in total, with Matteo Gigante winning 3 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 3. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Matteo Gigante was at the U.S. Open - New York, 21-08-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-5.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Gigante1
Wong1
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q2U.S. Open - New York(08-21-25)

Hard
HKG Flag
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
4
6
7
ITA Flag
Matteo Gigante
6
3
5

(Q3Nottingham 2 Challenger(06-15-25)

Grass
ITA Flag
Matteo Gigante
6
3
7
HKG Flag
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
1
6
6

M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

Stats
$571,445Career Prize Money$538,970
57.68% (169-124)Career Total W/L55.78% (164-130)
1Grass0
0Hard1
6Titles2
1Total H2H Matches1
50.00% (5-5)YTD Win/Loss45.45% (5-6)

M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

  • Recent second serve performance indicates Wong has a slightly higher win rate on points at 47.81% compared to Gigante's 45.12%. Could this serve reliability tip the scales?
  • On return games, Gigante holds a significant edge by winning 49.21% of the opponent's second serve points, surpassing Wong's 41.83%. Will this give Gigante the upper hand in gameplay?
  • When returning the first serve, Gigante outperforms Wong with a 26.56% win rate compared to 22.99%. Is Gigante's ability to counter strong serves decisive here?
  • Under pressure, Gigante saves breakpoints 54.85% of the time, slightly outperforming Wong’s 51.53%. Could this resilience be crucial in tight situations?
  • General performance over the past year reveals Gigante has a win rate of 56.45%, somewhat higher than Wong's 52.7%. Does this suggest better consistency?
  • Both athletes favor hard courts, though Gigante has a higher career win rate at 69% than Wong's 59%. Is this experience on their preferred surface a pivotal factor?
  • Their competition primarily in Challenger/ITF tournaments shows Wong winning a slightly higher percentage of matches at 55.32% versus Gigante's 53.85%. How significant is this difference?
  • Gigante leads the direct head-to-head battles, having won their previous encounter and possessing a 1-0 record over Wong.
  • In high-stakes games, including decisive sets and tiebreaks, Gigante has consistently come out on top against Wong. Could this psychological advantage sway the match?
  • Competition against higher-ranked opponents favor Gigante who faced an average rank of 205.55, compared to Wong’s 223.99. Does competing against tough opponents bolster Gigante's readiness?
  • Gigante exhibits superior strength in deciding sets, winning 76% over the last year, whereas Wong has a win rate of 55%. Could this be critical if the match extends?
  • In terms of recent breakpoint conversion, Wong surpasses Gigante with a 36.61% success rate against 31.76%. Will Wong's proficiency in capitalizing on breakpoints make a difference?

Editorial Prediction (August 21, 2025, UTC):

Gigante and Wong face each other on familiar hard court terrain, but various factors suggest Gigante might have a competitive edge. With a superior return game, especially against both first and second serves, Gigante seems well-positioned to exploit this facet of Wong's play effectively.

Gigante also showcases a commendable ability to endure under pressure, evident from breakpoint saving statistics and previous head-to-head encounters. The mental fortitude and experience in high-stakes scenarios are further supported by an impressive track record in deciding sets.

While Wong's recent performance, particularly in second serve and breakpoints, is notable, Gigante's consistency and past direct victories over Wong signal a potential repeat triumph. Taking into account Gigante's higher win percentage on preferred surfaces and experience against tougher opponents, Gigante emerges as the likely victor in this impending match.

Matteo Gigante vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won1
3Sets Won3
30Games Won30
7Aces (Total)21
13Total Double Faults6
2:6:21Average Match Time2:6:21
57% (104/184)1st Serve %57% (121/211)
72% (75/104)1st Serve Win %75% (91/121)
50% (40/80)2nd Serve Win %40% (36/90)
39% (7/18)Break Pts Won %37% (7/19)
40% (84/211)Return Points Win %38% (69/184)
50% (1/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)Deciding Set Win %50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Gigante 49%, Wong 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Gigante 54%, Wong 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Gigante 61%, Wong 59%.

M. Gigante Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardBNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm - 13-10-2025

Q1

NORV. Durasovic
L
4-2 ret.
I.hardOrleans Challenger - 22-09-2025

R2

GERJ. Engel
L
w/o

R1

FRAC. Chidekh
W
7-6(5) 7-5
HardSt. Tropez Challenger - 15-09-2025

R1

LTUE. Butvilas
L
4-6 6-3 6-3
HardU.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025

Q2

HKGC. Lam
L
4-6 6-3 7-5

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardTaipei Challenger - 03-11-2025

SF

AUSJ. Duckworth
L
6-3 6-4

QF

FRAM. Janvier
W
6-4 6-4

R2

TPET. Huang
W
6-4 6-4

R1

SUIL. Castelnuovo
W
6-4 4-6 7-5
HardSeoul Challenger - 27-10-2025

F

JPNS. Shimabukuro
L
6-4 6-3
banner

M. Gigante vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
57.68% (169/124)YTD Win/Loss55.78% (164/130)
55.33% (384/310)Sets Win/Loss54.07% (372/316)
51.96% (3409/3152)Games Win/Loss51.16% (3419/3264)
67.44% (58/28)Hard Win/Loss58.90% (129/90)
59.26% (96/66)Clay Win/Loss46.51% (20/23)
27.78% (10/26)Indoor Hard W/L50.00% (9/9)
55.56% (5/4)Grass Win/Loss42.86% (6/8)
0.29Aces Per Game0.52
934Aces Total1687
0.31Double Faults Per Game0.18
1012Total Double Faults603
1:35:50Average Match Time1:31:40
359.17Average Opponent Rank369.61
59% (11812/19965)1st Serve %60% (11331/18739)
68% (8068/11812)1st Serve Win %71% (8054/11331)
49% (4031/8153)2nd Serve Win %49% (3631/7408)
43% (920/2128)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (703/1718)
41% (8280/20212)Return Points Win %38% (7230/18830)
57.69% (15/11)Slam W/L53.33% (8/7)
42.86% (6/8)Masters W/L46.67% (7/8)
0% (0/0)Cups W/L62.50% (5/3)
18.18% (2/9)Main Tour W/L27.27% (3/8)
57.07% (109/82)Challenger W/L55.65% (69/55)
72.55% (37/14)Futures W/L59.50% (72/49)
58% (164/281)Best of 3 Sets Win %55% (157/286)
38% (3/8)Best of 5 Sets Win %83% (5/6)
56% (51/91)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)55% (56/102)
57% (59/103)Deciding Set Win %54% (51/94)
79% (173/137)1st Set Won, Won Match87% (157/136)
20% (173/34)1st Set Won, Lost Match13% (157/21)
25% (120/30)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (137/27)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tue, 25 Nov, 08:05 AM
Prediction
USAP. Brown
ROUD. N. Cazacu
W1
3.26
W2
1.28
Tue, 25 Nov, 11:30 AM
Prediction
FINP. Niklas-Salminenq
FINE. Vasa
W1
3.74
W2
1.22
Tue, 25 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
USAS. Kirchheimer
BRAD. D. D. Silva
W1
1.88
W2
1.8
Tue, 25 Nov, 11:30 AM
Prediction
BELM. Geerts
GBRG. Hussey4
W1
2.03
W2
1.68
Tue, 25 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
ARGL. Rattiq
LIBH. Habib2
W1
4.15
W2
1.184
Tue, 25 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
CZEJ. Kumstatq
POLM. KasnikowskiALT
W1
2.64
W2
1.41